So I honestly wouldn't be surprised if it did actually have worse overall bulkhead armor just due to it being slimmer. It could be totally possible that they are inaccurate, as people have found legitimate errors on New Orleans and Montana, but the Iowa was an entirely new design built primarily for speed. I'm no expert but I do know that the hull design of Iowa is a different scheme than the NC and SD lines. Same goes for other ships if their armor is wrong. North Carolina has a uniform bulkhead thickness of 282mm, and from what I can tell, Iowa should have 287mm which tapers to 216mm near the bottom.ĮDIT: If you can't tell, I would not be against a buff to Iowa's frontal bulkhead armor if it is indeed wrong. In the game, her bulkhead armor is worse than North Carolina, but I believe that it should be the same or even better. One battleship that I want to specifically look at is Iowa. I would like to see if these armor values are in fact historical or not. That will allow you to see the internal armor. I would like to have a discussion on the armor thicknesses of the frontal bulkhead of the T8-10 battleships.įor anyone who does not know how to view the frontal bulkhead armor, go to the armor viewer and remove the first option. Do not come here complaining about how your favorite battleship is now "useless" because you can't be immune to damage from the front. Preface: Assume that the 28mm bow armor change is on the live server.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |